<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><br><div><div>On May 17, 2010, at 7:14 AM, Edgar J. De Cleene wrote:</div><blockquote type="cite"><div><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#000000"><br></font>But is .<br><br>Again I beg going to SqueakCore .image as default....<br><br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Hi Edgar, </div><div><br></div><div>We had a long discussion about this in the "Edgar from the Ostracism" thread. I thought that the conclusion was that you were convinced by the argument that Andreas made, and that you were satisfied. Now it seems like we're right back where we started.</div><div><br></div><div>I still have the same problem with SqueakCore as I did before: I don't understand what's better about it than what we currently have. I glanced over the previous emails to refresh my memory, and although I asked for an explanation, I didn't find one. Please refresh my memory if I missed it. If I didn't miss it, then please explain the differences and benefits of SqueakCore. </div><div><br></div><div>Begging won't get you anywhere, especially if people don't understand your proposal. However, a rational argument might.</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers,</div><div>Josh</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#000000"><br></font><br>Edgar<br><br><br><br></div></blockquote></div><br></body></html>