Hi Nicholas,<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Nicolas Cellier <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:nicolas.cellier.aka.nice@gmail.com">nicolas.cellier.aka.nice@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">For those trying to build cog with a recent cygwin having gcc-4 as<br>
default gcc, this command can help:<br>
<br>
make CC=gcc-3 LD=gcc-3 DLLWRAP='dllwrap -mno-cygwin --driver-name gcc-3'<br>
<br>
Maybe this could be added in HowToBuild...<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Send me a version and I'll integrate. But I'm curious. Have you tried to build with gcc-4? What fails? gcc 4 works fine on linux and Mac OS.</div>
<div><br></div><div>best,</div><div>Eliot</div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<br>
Nicolas<br>
<br>
2010/9/4 George Herolyants <<a href="mailto:george.herolyants@gmail.com">george.herolyants@gmail.com</a>>:<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5">> That's what I meant by "fully equivalent" :) Thanks!<br>
><br>
> 2010/9/4 Eliot Miranda <<a href="mailto:eliot.miranda@gmail.com">eliot.miranda@gmail.com</a>>:<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 10:55 AM, George Herolyants<br>
>> <<a href="mailto:george.herolyants@gmail.com">george.herolyants@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>>><br>
>>> Hi, Eliot.<br>
>>><br>
>>> 2010/9/4 Eliot Miranda <<a href="mailto:eliot.miranda@gmail.com">eliot.miranda@gmail.com</a>>:<br>
>>> > Have you tried building a Cog VM recently? The advantage this has is<br>
>>> > that<br>
>>> > everything you need to build is already in the svn repository.<br>
>>> ><br>
>>> > See <a href="http://www.squeakvm.org/svn/squeak/branches/Cog/cygwinbuild/HowToBuild" target="_blank">http://www.squeakvm.org/svn/squeak/branches/Cog/cygwinbuild/HowToBuild</a><br>
>>><br>
>>> Great! I'm sorry, I didn't follow the Cog discussion tightly, is it<br>
>>> fully equivalent to the "regular" squeak vm regarding plugins?<br>
>><br>
>> What do you mean by "fully equivalent"? You should be able to build any<br>
>> regular plugin against Cog and apart from things like the<br>
>> UnixOSProcessPlugin they should work. But the proof is in the pudding.<br>
>> Eliot<br>
>><br>
>>><br>
>>> Thanks,<br>
>>> George<br>
>>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
><br>
><br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>