<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
    On 10/25/10 2:23 PM, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
    <blockquote
      cite="mid:87086BC8-5BFB-477E-9D79-781AC4114802@freudenbergs.de"
      type="cite"><br>
      <div>
        <div>On 25.10.2010, at 23:10, Eliot Miranda wrote:</div>
        <br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
        <blockquote type="cite"><br>
          <br>
          <div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 1:59 PM,
            Lawson English <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a
                moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:lenglish5@cox.net">lenglish5@cox.net</a>&gt;</span>
            wrote:<br>
            <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt
              0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);
              padding-left: 1ex;">
              In the Wikipedia entry on Smalltalk, there is this line in
              the history section, 3rd paragraph, added roughly a year
              ago: &nbsp;"...Smalltalk-80 added [[metaclass]]es, to help
              maintain the "everything is an object" (except private
              instance variables) paradigm by associating properties and
              behavior with individual classes, ..."<br>
              <br>
              <br>
              Is this one of those esoteric details that mere mortals
              are not meant to understand, or is this an error?<br>
            </blockquote>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>"(except private instance variables)" looks like a dig
              or a jibe. &nbsp;I would have put it</div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>&nbsp;"...Smalltalk-80 added [[metaclass]]es, to help
              maintain the "everything is an object" paradigm by
              allowing classes to have their own specific state and
              behavior, ..."</div>
            <div>&nbsp;</div>
            <div>Perhaps they were trying to say that because Smalltalk
              lacks private instance variables Smalltalk objects are not
              true objects, which is I suppose arguable. &nbsp;But it makes
              poor sense to state that private instance variables aren't
              objects; public inst vars aren't objects either.</div>
          </div>
        </blockquote>
        <br>
      </div>
      <div>It's plain nonsense. Here's the edit that added the "private
        instance" modifier:</div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Smalltalk&amp;diff=prev&amp;oldid=280020438">http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Smalltalk&amp;diff=prev&amp;oldid=280020438</a></div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>Someone should just correct it.</div>
      <br>
    </blockquote>
    So now I just confused (more). Instance variables are NOT objects in
    Squeak?<br>
    <br>
    <br>
    Lawson<br>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>