<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Tobias Pape <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:Das.Linux@gmx.de">Das.Linux@gmx.de</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Am 2010-10-27 um 23:25 schrieb Eliot Miranda:<br>
<div class="im">><br>
><br>
> > Off the top of my head, only the latter makes sense. There are no senders of allowUnderscoreAsAssignment in the base Compiler package so one would be tempted to delete it. Why can't it be an extension in OB?<br>
><br>
> Because its about AST ;)<br>
><br>
> So why not an extension in AST? :)<br>
><br>
<br>
</div>Where would you put that, better, where would you put AST-Core-Squeak…?<br>
or how one should name it…<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>That's not my question to answer. But why add a method with no senders in Compiler, that is needed by AST (and transitively by OB) to Compiler rather than somewhere appropriate in AST?</div>
<div><br></div><div>best,</div><div>Eliot</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<br>
So Long,<br>
<font color="#888888"> -Tobias<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br>