On 7 January 2011 14:24, Lawson English <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:lenglish5@cox.net">lenglish5@cox.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
Once again, it seems like the Squeak community will need to approach Steve Jobs concerning these issues, using as many avenues as possible (e.g. Alan Kay letter, etc). The strategy used for the iPhone may or may not work, but it seems the only course of action.<br>
<br>
Lawson<div class="im"><br></div></blockquote><div>[snip]<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="im">
<br>
</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="im"># 6.3<br>
#<br>
# Apps that do not use system provided items, such as buttons and<br>
# icons, correctly and as described in the Apple Macintosh Human<br>
# Interface Guidelines will be rejected<br>
<br>
# 6.4<br>
#<br>
# Apple and our customers place a high value on simple, refined,<br>
# creative, well thought through interfaces. They take more work but<br>
# are worth it. Apple sets a high bar. If your user interface is complex<br>
# or less than very good it may be rejected<br></div></blockquote></blockquote><div><br>I don't think we need to worry about these last two, given the applications that are already getting through: <a href="http://readthefuckinghig.tumblr.com/">http://readthefuckinghig.tumblr.com/</a> <br>
</div></div>