If there are no new candidates, I have no problems with #2 - we know who the people are and what they do.<br><br>rado<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2011/3/28 Göran Krampe <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:goran@krampe.se">goran@krampe.se</a>></span><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Hi all!<br>
<br>
I have been slacking a bit on handling this years Election, and the result is now that we have a slight "conundrum".<br>
<br>
The good news is that we have 7 candidates announced, 4 re-running and 3 new candidates (thus 3 deciding to not re-run this year):<br>
<br>
<a href="http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/6162" target="_blank">http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/6162</a><br>
<br>
<br>
...the bad news is that the board usually has 7 members, so we are quite short on candidates in fact.<br>
<br>
Instead of making an immediate decision on how to handle this I want you - the community - to speak up. What should we do? Options:<br>
<br>
1. Prolong the candidacy period, and/or let it continue up until the day before the election starts. Hopefully getting more candidates.<br>
<br>
2. Skip the rest and just grab the 7 we have! :)<br>
<br>
3. Decide to lower the number of seats on the board.<br>
<br>
<br>
...well, I can't think of more options right now. What do you all think?<br>
<br>
regards, Göran<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br>