<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Do you mean extract cogwin.zip into the Squeak-All-In-One folder and
then rename croquet.exe to squeak.exe ?<br>
<br>
Hannes Hirzel wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:BANLkTikLh=Rg16RV5npGcbzJB3BzkaekTw@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">To have Squeak with Cog I replaced the old Squeak VM with a Cog one
from <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.mirandabanda.org/files/Cog/VM/">http://www.mirandabanda.org/files/Cog/VM/</a> (MSWindows)
--Hannes
On 4/29/11, Ben Coman <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:btc@openinworld.com"><btc@openinworld.com></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hannes Hirzel wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I agree. Does this imply that two all-in-one packages are needed, a
Cog and an non-cog?
--Hannes
On 4/28/11, Levente Uzonyi <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:leves@elte.hu"><leves@elte.hu></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Since this isn't the first time people do benchmarks, but don't download
VMs independently, therefore I think we have to package VMs with the
releases in the future. IIRC someone even concluded that Pharo is faster
than Squeak, but he just used what he got from the website (Cog for Pharo
and the interpreter vm for Squeak).
Levente
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">Is the difference between a Cog and non-Cog VM just the a different exe
(for windows)?
How compatible are the images for Cog and non-Cog?
Could two executables be included in a single All-In-One package - ie
named like SqueakClassic.exe & SqueakCog.exe ?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>