<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 8:19 AM, Levente Uzonyi <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:leves@elte.hu">leves@elte.hu</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im">On Fri, 29 Apr 2011, Hannes Hirzel wrote:<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Yes, unzip.<br>
<br>
You do not need to rename the file. croquet.exe. Just double click and<br>
then it looks for the image file and launches it.<br>
<br>
But I think you cannot go back to squeak.exe after you have started<br>
and saved the image with croquet.exe. (Others please correct me)<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
Squeak images saved by the CogVM will have a new image format. The current release (4.1.1) of SqueakVM for windows can't read such images. I built a VM which can be used to convert your images back to the old formatl. It's available here: <a href="http://leves.web.elte.hu/squeak/SqueakVM-Win32-4.4.9-2358-non-official-bin.zip" target="_blank">http://leves.web.elte.hu/squeak/SqueakVM-Win32-4.4.9-2358-non-official-bin.zip</a></blockquote>
<div><br></div><div>Have these changes been folded back into VMMaker trunk? </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><br><font color="#888888">
<br>
<br>
Levente</font><div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
--Hannes<br>
<br>
On 4/29/11, Ben Coman <<a href="mailto:btc@openinworld.com" target="_blank">btc@openinworld.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Do you mean extract cogwin.zip into the Squeak-All-In-One folder and then<br>
rename croquet.exe to squeak.exe ?<br>
<br>
Hannes Hirzel wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
To have Squeak with Cog I replaced the old Squeak VM with a Cog one<br>
from <a href="http://www.mirandabanda.org/files/Cog/VM/" target="_blank">http://www.mirandabanda.org/files/Cog/VM/</a> (MSWindows)<br>
<br>
--Hannes<br>
<br>
On 4/29/11, Ben Coman <<a href="mailto:btc@openinworld.com" target="_blank">btc@openinworld.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
Hannes Hirzel wrote:<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
I agree. Does this imply that two all-in-one packages are needed, a<br>
Cog and an non-cog?<br>
<br>
--Hannes<br>
<br>
On 4/28/11, Levente Uzonyi <<a href="mailto:leves@elte.hu" target="_blank">leves@elte.hu</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
Since this isn't the first time people do benchmarks, but don't<br>
download<br>
VMs independently, therefore I think we have to package VMs with the<br>
releases in the future. IIRC someone even concluded that Pharo is<br>
faster<br>
than Squeak, but he just used what he got from the website (Cog for<br>
Pharo<br>
and the interpreter vm for Squeak).<br>
<br>
<br>
Levente<br>
<br>
</blockquote></blockquote>
<br>
Is the difference between a Cog and non-Cog VM just the a different exe<br>
(for windows)?<br>
How compatible are the images for Cog and non-Cog?<br>
Could two executables be included in a single All-In-One package - ie<br>
named like SqueakClassic.exe & SqueakCog.exe ?<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>