I like the names:)<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 10:48 AM, I3 Project <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:i3text@gmail.com">i3text@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Although Smalltalk environments traditionally use variable width<br>
fonts, people are sometimes motivated to switch to a monospaced font.<br>
When I look at the reasons, I think it is mostly because the variable<br>
width fonts we have were not specifically designed for showing code.<br>
<br>
As an experiment, I made a set of proportional fonts that incorporate<br>
the design features we expect in a programming font. There are both<br>
bitmap and vector fonts.<br>
<br>
Note especially that the spacing is adjusted so you don't have to use<br>
tabs for indentation. This means you can write code that looks good<br>
with either a monospaced or proportional font.<br>
<br>
All the fonts are release to the public domain (via the Unlicense) and<br>
can be found at <a href="http://code.google.com/p/i3project/wiki/Fonts" target="_blank">http://code.google.com/p/i3project/wiki/Fonts</a>.<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br>Casey Ransberger<br>