<html><head></head><body bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(26, 26, 26, 0.296875); -webkit-composition-fill-color: rgba(175, 192, 227, 0.230469); -webkit-composition-frame-color: rgba(77, 128, 180, 0.230469); ">Am 14.03.2012 um 19:42 schrieb Nicolas Cellier <<a href="mailto:nicolas.cellier.aka.nice@gmail.com">nicolas.cellier.aka.nice@gmail.com</a>>:</span><br></div></div><div><br></div><div></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>Didn't the missing methods migrate into the GetText package ?<br>If it was the case, then we could make the update work with a proper MCconfiguration with proper load order...<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>But I see no reason to move those methods into the GetText package. That seems to be an artifact from earlier development. </div><div><br></div><div>Edgar: we can't just copy the Etoys packages. If it was as simple, we would have done it a long time ago :) You need to use proper judgement what would work best in trunk, not just use what's in Etoys.</div><div><br></div><div>E.g., in Etoys we always have the GetText package loaded. But for Squeak, it should be optional, because we have the goal of making the core image smaller. That means, e.g. String>>translated should be in the System package, not in GetText. </div><div><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>Using the diffs reported in the mailing list, it's impossible to tell, since they are against a version which was not added or not reported...<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(26, 26, 26, 0.292969); -webkit-composition-fill-color: rgba(175, 192, 227, 0.230469); -webkit-composition-frame-color: rgba(77, 128, 180, 0.230469); ">The diffs are generated by our squeak source server. So they are meaningful, because they</span> are always reported against an ancestor that is in trunk. </div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(26, 26, 26, 0.296875); -webkit-composition-fill-color: rgba(175, 192, 227, 0.230469); -webkit-composition-frame-color: rgba(77, 128, 180, 0.230469); "><br></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(26, 26, 26, 0.296875); -webkit-composition-fill-color: rgba(175, 192, 227, 0.230469); -webkit-composition-frame-color: rgba(77, 128, 180, 0.230469); ">- Bert -</span><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(26, 26, 26, 0.292969); -webkit-composition-fill-color: rgba(175, 192, 227, 0.230469); -webkit-composition-frame-color: rgba(77, 128, 180, 0.230469);"><br></span><blockquote type="cite"><div>
<br>Let's ask Edgar...<br><br>Nicolas<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">Le 14 mars 2012 18:08, Bert Freudenberg <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bert@freudenbergs.de">bert@freudenbergs.de</a>></span> a écrit :<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">It looks like Edgar's latest packages broke the system. I see only removals in the diffs, was this intentional?<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
- Bert -<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br>
</div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><span></span><br></div></blockquote></div></body></html>