<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<font face="Georgia">The black halo does a bit more than change
ownership hierarchy. It is also useful for bringing a morph to the
front while leaving its ownership exactly the same.<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Bob<br>
</font><br>
On 3/31/12 12:29 PM, Chris Muller wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:CANzdToEDzNCnYU5mMXi_hgZC1Ag56PibA+CqK3AD4SfzEh9zyw@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I see the black halo's purpose as for changing Morph ownership
hierarchy, not moving or positioning. Brown halo is for moving.
2012/3/31 Stéphane Rollandin <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:lecteur@zogotounga.net"><lecteur@zogotounga.net></a>:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Well, that was the primary _effect_ I want -- not a side-effect.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
Sorry but that is not acceptable. For fine-tuning of the morph position, the
halo must be stable: just grabing the handle should not move the morph.
Think of it this way: you grab the morph via the halo handle, then decide
that eventually you do not want to move it: esay, you just release the
handle and that'is it. But if the morph has been moved immediately, how do
you get back to the initial position ?
Also, a morph may have a specific behavior depending on its precise
position, and it is then crucial to be able to change the position
continuously.
As far as I am concerned, this change would completely break my code. I am
strongly opposed to it.
Best,
Stef
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>