<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Chris Cunnington <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:smalltalktelevision@gmail.com" target="_blank">smalltalktelevision@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">On 12-08-02 2:28 PM, Louis LaBrunda wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
On Thu, 2 Aug 2012 10:35:37 -0700, Eliot Miranda <<a href="mailto:eliot.miranda@gmail.com" target="_blank">eliot.miranda@gmail.com</a>><br>
wrote:<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Chris Cunnington <<br>
<a href="mailto:smalltalktelevision@gmail.com" target="_blank">smalltalktelevision@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
I don't actually use a mail client. I read the Archive and cut and paste<br>
new messages. I don't press Reply. Only Send.<br>
</blockquote>
Doing this is a pain. It causes your replies to start a new thread in the<br>
readers the vast majority of us use. Why don't you use a mail reader?<br>
</blockquote>
Sorry to be off topic but to stick up for Chris: I use Forte Agent, a<br>
combination email client and news reader. I follow this thread from the<br>
newsgroup "gmane.comp.lang.smalltalk.<u></u>squeak.general" (not as email) but<br>
from the news reader part of Forte Agent. Forte Agent groups ALL the<br>
messages of this thread as one thread. Chris's subject lines are "First<br>
green ball", Frank and Bert's are "Re: First green ball" and all are<br>
grouped as one thread. Don't ask me how Forte Agent does it but it does.<br>
<br>
I expect this post will be "Re: Re: First green ball" because I am replying<br>
to Eliot's post. I hope it does not start a new thread, I'm sure it won't<br>
for me. If I could wave a magic wand, I would just get rid of all the<br>
"Re:" stuff as it often becomes a long "Re: Re: Re: Re:" (and some times<br>
with the "Re:" equivalent from some language other than English) and adds<br>
nothing to the understanding of the subject. And if they get long enough,<br>
can push the subject out of view.<br>
<br>
Anyway, sorry for the rant but lets not be too hard on Chris.<br>
<br>
Lou<br>
------------------------------<u></u>-----------------------------<br>
Louis LaBrunda<br>
Keystone Software Corp.<br>
SkypeMe <a href="callto://PhotonDemon" target="_blank">callto://PhotonDemon</a><br>
mailto:<a href="mailto:Lou@Keystone-Software.com" target="_blank">Lou@Keystone-Software.<u></u>com</a> <a href="http://www.Keystone-Software.com" target="_blank">http://www.Keystone-Software.<u></u>com</a><br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div></div>
Thanks, Lou. But resistance is futile. I've been assimilated. :o</blockquote><div><br></div><div>Thanks!!</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
Chris<br>
<br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br>best,<div>Eliot</div><br>