On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Frank Shearar <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:frank.shearar@gmail.com" target="_blank">frank.shearar@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
On 18 December 2012 16:04, Chris Muller <<a href="mailto:asqueaker@gmail.com">asqueaker@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>> I've mentioned before that I _can't_ name the file with a proper<br>
>> version, because this image is currently _ahead_ of trunk. That will<br>
>> eventually change, of course. I'll definitely note renaming the files<br>
>> on my todo list.<br>
><br>
> I don't want to badger you but, why is it ahead of trunk? It seems<br>
> like any patches that are good enough for the RC should be good enough<br>
> for the trunk repository. I'm confused..<br>
<br>
I haven't seen anyone say "yeah, that doesn't look crazy" yet :) The<br>
idea is that I hack on the RC and, when people say "yeah OK", then I<br>
fold the ReleaseBuilder + Morphic changes into trunk, and version<br>
"correctly".<br><br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Ok, it's just that we'll need to hack on it yet again after you've versioned "correctly" and before putting it on the web-site. So the payback for testing now seems pretty low.</div>
</div>