<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<font face="Georgia">IIRC, that was one of the features of the
Whisker Browser back in the day.<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/1993">http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/1993</a><br>
<br>
</font><br>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Times; font-size:
medium; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight:
normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2;
text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none;
white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px;
-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;
background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); display: inline !important;
float: none;">The goal of the Whisker Browser (a.k.a. Stacking
Browser) is to provide a simple and intuitive way to view the
contents of multiple classes and multiple methods simultaneously,
while using screen real estate efficiently and not requiring a lot
of window moving/resizing. It does this by introducing the concept
of subpane stacking. ...</span>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Bob<br>
<br>
On 1/2/13 5:32 PM, Frank Shearar wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAJbhyRE7+u5B1MNLf5tEbgDw8rp2wjVvjuAT5LSEA=DUZ2ta2Q@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">The only advantage I still see of lots-of-stuff-inna-file is that you
can very quickly hop around a bunch of code. Our tools just don't work
that way. They <span class="moz-txt-underscore"><span class="moz-txt-tag">_</span>could<span class="moz-txt-tag">_</span></span>. Noone's just ever hurt enough to display code
in this fashion. It's easy enough: what's not so easy is to make that
big blob of text efficiently editable such that you still keep track
of the, for example, individual methods. </pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>