<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra">On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Ken G. Brown <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:kbrown@mac.com" target="_blank">kbrown@mac.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>I think the best way to do the story straight is to keep the releases separate. I really find distasteful the idea of a bunch of big files hidden in a Mac .app package in the interest of all-in-one, especially if it is Windows stuff.<br>
</div></div>
I think if someone wants to easily be able to copy their stuff back and forth between platforms, it should be easy to throw a couple of separate platform downloads into a folder and subsequently move that folder.<br><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
</font></span></blockquote><div style>Along that line, I have recently (last 2 months) begun to completely re-assemble the structure of the programs once I've installed the all-in-ones onto windows, usually throwing away the non-windows parts and then removing most (or all) of the directory structures. It became tedious to keep opening folder after folder to get to the image.</div>
<div style><br></div><div style>I'm starting to use Linux for this (maybe tomorrow) - so i have no idea if I'll wind up doing the same there or not. And, yes, I'll start swapping between machines, so I don't know if I'd like an all-in-one at that point, or another way of handling it. I'll see.</div>
<div style><br></div><div style>-Chris (another one) </div></div><br></div></div>