<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div>On 29.01.2013, at 20:11, Stéphane Rollandin <<a href="mailto:lecteur@zogotounga.net">lecteur@zogotounga.net</a>> wrote:</div><div><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><blockquote type="cite"><span>In the root project there is a list of changes made to 2.8 along with</span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span>some image prep actions. Are you migrating Scratch to a newer image?</span><br></blockquote><span></span><br><span>Only if that appears to be manageable. One of my daughters loves Scratch and it would be nice if I could expand it to my (and her) tastes. Now BYOB 3.1 is already very nice as it is.</span><br><span></span><br><span>But I'm curious...</span><br><span></span><br><span>Stef</span><br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Well, if you just want to modify it then there is no need for porting, right? Just use the image as it is. </div><div><br></div><div>If you want to us a modern squeak, then someone else already extracted the important bits, which might be a good starting point:</div><div><br></div><div><a href="http://www.squeaksource.com/nscratch.html">http://www.squeaksource.com/nscratch.html</a></div><div><div style="-webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(26, 26, 26, 0.296875); -webkit-composition-fill-color: rgba(175, 192, 227, 0.230469); -webkit-composition-frame-color: rgba(77, 128, 180, 0.230469); "><br>- Bert -<div><br></div></div></div></body></html>