<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Igor Stasenko <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:siguctua@gmail.com" target="_blank">siguctua@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:rgb(34,34,34)">you mean changing compiler to compile</span><br>
</div>
"<obj> Foo" message send for accessing Foo name, instead of direct<br>
binding access?</blockquote><div><br></div><div>Oh, I see. The source code still reads as a variable access, but the bytecode implements a message send. Sure, that would be equivalent to Eliot's idea. Instead of a different receiver for each variable, it's a different message for each variable.</div>
<div><br></div><div>That's a lot more feasible, but I don't see any advantage over just sending #value to the binding, and it's more work. We already have tools that know how to deal with bindings, and they'd all have to be converted to the new scheme.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Colin</div><div> </div></div></div></div>