<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 3:53 AM, Bert Freudenberg <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bert@freudenbergs.de" target="_blank">bert@freudenbergs.de</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">On 2013-03-05, at 02:40, Colin Putney <<a href="mailto:colin@wiresong.com">colin@wiresong.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Igor Stasenko <<a href="mailto:siguctua@gmail.com">siguctua@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
>> you mean changing compiler to compile<br>
>> "<obj> Foo" message send for accessing Foo name, instead of direct<br>
>> binding access?<br>
>><br>
> Oh, I see. The source code still reads as a variable access, but the bytecode implements a message send.<br>
<br>
</div>No, I think Igor is proposing to write something like "self environment Foo" to access Foo. Which is flexible, granted, but looks ugly.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>That's what I thought too, but that obviously breaks compatibility with existing code, which Igor claims his proposal does not.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Colin </div></div></div></div>