I know it's a question of pride to have the homepage of a programming language done in said language but these cycles of "rewrite in technology X/abandonment/how do we update the site again?" are pretty silly. Is the anything on the website that's actually benefiting from having a smalltalk implementation? Why not just slap a wordpress or any of the zillion externally maintained cms systems on the server and be done with it? It should be the content that counts.<div>
<br></div><div>rado<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Janko Mivšek <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:janko.mivsek@eranova.si" target="_blank">janko.mivsek@eranova.si</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Dne 07. 03. 2013 17:26, piše Chris Cunnington:<br>
<div class="im">>>I'd propose that at least for short-term we continue with last summer<br>
>>action to upgrade website to the latest Aida. Then I namely managed to<br>
>>migrate most of it already, maybe a day or two is yet needed to finish<br>
>>that part.<br>
><br>
>>This way Chris can have a time to continue work on a new website. At<br>
>>least on the new design and content if not the complete one. Newest Aida<br>
>>6.5 namely supports Twitter Bootstrap CSS framework used for the new<br>
>>design, so we can adopt the new design easily, if needed.<br>
><br>
> That sounds like a plan. I believe we are both the head of the Web Team,<br>
> so let's proceed.<br>
><br>
> Let's replace the current Aida with a newer version. The prototype I<br>
> made has only has one advantage, which is Bootstrap, which Aida already<br>
> has. I envision the current Aida homepage with the carousel from my<br>
> prototype. Clearly some thought needs to go into how those two would fit<br>
> together.<br>
><br>
> We will have more visual continuity by staying with the design we have<br>
> now. Though, lots of links need to be removed or updated in the current<br>
> site.<br>
<br>
</div>What if you simply continue with design on Altitude because you are<br>
already accustomed of it. That way you'll come to the final design<br>
faster than learning Aida first. In the meantime I'll migrate the<br>
current wesite to newest Aida. Later we can simply migrate design (and<br>
content) from Altitude to Aida.<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
Janko<br>
</font></span><div class="im HOEnZb"><br>
> It might be easier to use RFB in the image and not use external VNC. I<br>
> recommend adding Ian's RFB to the Aida image, so members of the Web Team<br>
> can control/reboot RFB problems themselves.<br>
><br>
> Let me download Aida/Scribo and play with it for a week and perhaps we<br>
> could follow up.<br>
><br>
> Thanks,<br>
> Chris<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
<br>
</div><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">--<br>
Janko Mivšek<br>
Svetovalec za informatiko<br>
Eranova d.o.o.<br>
Ljubljana, Slovenija<br>
<a href="http://www.eranova.si" target="_blank">www.eranova.si</a><br>
tel: 01 514 22 55<br>
faks: 01 514 22 56<br>
gsm: 031 674 565<br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>