<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Chris Muller <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:asqueaker@gmail.com" target="_blank">asqueaker@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">> This "feature" is misguided because a class can belong to multiple packages. So asking a class for its single package info is wrong.<br>
<br>
</div>(Why such strong words?) A class can only be defined in one package,<br>
just as in Monticello, and this method simply associates its MC<br>
equivalent to PackageInfo domain objects. Why do you say a class can<br>
belong to multiple packages -- because of extensions?</blockquote><div><br></div><div> A class *can* be part of multiple packages. </div><div><br></div><div>Imagine you have two packages, 'Foo' and 'Foo-Bar'. All the classes that belong to 'Foo-Bar' are also part of 'Foo'. </div>
<div><br></div><div>Colin</div></div></div></div>