<div dir="ltr"><div>Colin is right, whatever the choice and unlike become: we'll have to rehash something...<br>And we must not forget that we always have to rehash ordinary (vs identity) Set/Dictionary , becomeForward: or not...<br>
</div>Though, I would prefer the opposite behavior like Bert, because a frequent usage is to replace references to a new object with references to an older one, and IMO it's more conservative to preserve the older one.<br>
</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2013/4/13 Bert Freudenberg <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bert@freudenbergs.de" target="_blank">bert@freudenbergs.de</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="auto"><div>Am 12.04.2013 um 23:47 schrieb Colin Putney <<a href="mailto:colin@wiresong.com" target="_blank">colin@wiresong.com</a>>:</div><div><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra">
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Bert Freudenberg <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bert@freudenbergs.de" target="_blank">bert@freudenbergs.de</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote">
<div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="auto"><div>Maybe we should change the default?</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>No, I think we'd just get subtle bugs of the opposite sort.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Colin</div></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div>Well, my mental model was that the become target would not change at all. According to previous discussions, that is also how other Smalltalks handle it.<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><div>
<br></div><div><div>- Bert -</div></div></font></span></div><br><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>