<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Re: [squeak-dev] The Future of Squeak</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<FONT SIZE="4"><FONT FACE="Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'><BR>
<BR>
<BR>
On 4/16/13 2:13 AM, "Chris Cunningham" <cunningham.cb@gmail.com> wrote:<BR>
<BR>
</SPAN></FONT></FONT><BLOCKQUOTE><FONT SIZE="4"><FONT FACE="Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'>On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Chris Muller <<FONT COLOR="#0000FF"><U>asqueaker@gmail.com</U></FONT>> wrote:<BR>
<snip> <BR>
</SPAN></FONT></FONT><BLOCKQUOTE><FONT SIZE="4"><FONT FACE="Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'>... For example, MathMorphs are probably works in<BR>
some old image and possibly able to be brought forward so I'd hate to<BR>
see perfectly good documentation completely annihilated simply because<BR>
someone considered it "old and out of date".<BR>
<BR>
</SPAN></FONT></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE><FONT SIZE="4"><FONT FACE="Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'>Interesting. In early 2011, Edgar had MathMorphs working in his FunSqueak based on Squeak 4.2, so this is definitely doable. So as documentation, it does have uses.<BR>
<BR>
There are undoubtedly parts that aren't useful as well, at least to some of us. For now. Hmm. <BR>
</SPAN></FONT></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE><FONT SIZE="4"><FONT FACE="Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'><BR>
<BR>
<a href="http://img541.imageshack.us/img541/7019/screenshot20130416at918.png">http://img541.imageshack.us/img541/7019/screenshot20130416at918.png</a><BR>
Here you see original Caniglia et al works still working in Squeak 4.5 updated today.<BR>
<BR>
Edgar</SPAN></FONT></FONT>
</BODY>
</HTML>