but with aliases dont we have to do much more work? don;t we have to look for references to the binding and/or its aliases?<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 4:55 PM, <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:commits@source.squeak.org" target="_blank">commits@source.squeak.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Changes to Trunk (<a href="http://source.squeak.org/trunk.html" target="_blank">http://source.squeak.org/trunk.html</a>) in the last 24 hours:<br>
<br>
<a href="http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/packages/2013-April/005881.html" target="_blank">http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/packages/2013-April/005881.html</a><br>
<br>
Name: System-cwp.526<br>
Ancestors: System-ul.525<br>
<br>
Update Behavior>>allCallsOn to search for references using #bindingOf: rather than #associationAt:. This matches the binding created by the compiler.<br>
<br>
=============================================<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br>best,<div>Eliot</div>