<div dir="ltr"><div><div><div><div><div>Interesting, but the primitive is digitDiv:neg: , not \\\<br></div>Why wouldn't the primitive be reported on the Smalltalk stack?<br><br></div>By the way, \\\ is not really usefull anymore.<br>
</div>The main difference is that \\\ avoids a normalization of the result. Please note that you should not use it with negative receiver or argument.<br></div>Also note that \\ should be faster for Small Integers and for LargeInteger up to 64 bits (we now have a primitive for that)<br>
For LargeIntegers > 64 bits, \\ will be a bit longer because we pass thru a primitiveFail before calling same primitive than \\\, and then normalize quotient and remainder.<br><br></div>Nicolas<br></div><div class="gmail_extra">
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2013/6/16 Frank Shearar <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:frank.shearar@gmail.com" target="_blank">frank.shearar@gmail.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">On 16 June 2013 10:13, Frank Shearar <<a href="mailto:frank.shearar@gmail.com">frank.shearar@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> On 9 December 2012 00:00, David T. Lewis <<a href="mailto:lewis@mail.msen.com">lewis@mail.msen.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>> On Sat, Dec 08, 2012 at 10:48:16PM +0000, Frank Shearar wrote:<br>
>>> On 8 December 2012 21:56, David T. Lewis <<a href="mailto:lewis@mail.msen.com">lewis@mail.msen.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>>> > On Sat, Dec 08, 2012 at 09:50:21PM +0000, Frank Shearar wrote:<br>
>>> >> On 8 December 2012 21:24, David T. Lewis <<a href="mailto:lewis@mail.msen.com">lewis@mail.msen.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>>> >> ><br>
>>> >> > We may have tripped an intermittent bug, and it might or might not be<br>
>>> >> > aggrivated by the image having been saved in the 6504 format. The actual<br>
>>> >> > failure was in a LargeIntegersPlugin primitive, so I'm not quite sure<br>
>>> >> > what to make of it.<br>
>>> >><br>
>>> >> Indeed. #55 passed, and so has #56.<br>
>>> >><br>
>>> ><br>
>>> > I see three successful runs now. It wouldn't hurt to run it a couple more<br>
>>> > times and see if it stays healthy. But I need to leave for an hour or two,<br>
>>> > so I won't do anything further right now.<br>
>>><br>
>>> #57 - 60 have all passed.<br>
>>><br>
>><br>
>> Good. Whatever it was, it's not an issue to get in the way of the release.<br>
><br>
> It just manifested again, for the first time in ages:<br>
> <a href="http://build.squeak.org/job/SqueakTrunk/383/console" target="_blank">http://build.squeak.org/job/SqueakTrunk/383/console</a><br>
<br>
</div></div>And here's the crash dump.<br>
<br>
> frank<br>
><br>
><br>
>> Dave<br>
>><br>
<br><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>