<div dir="ltr">So, I for one do not like the 'automatic copy' idea at all. In fact, I'd need to disable it in any image that I ran.<div><br></div><div>Reason: some of the coding that I do gets done at my business, and occassionally a method will be placed in the wrong package and committed (locally). Once I find that and remove it, I may then publish the newly cleaned package out. If I had to worry about the image automatically pushing out an version that should not be released (due to possibly exposing code that shouldn't be), then I couldn't really afford to use it.</div>
<div><br></div><div>I may be the only one with this worry. In any case, I like to know and have control over exactly what I release out in the wild.</div><div><br></div><div>-Chris</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Bert Freudenberg <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bert@freudenbergs.de" target="_blank">bert@freudenbergs.de</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im">On 2013-08-16, at 17:16, Chris Muller <<a href="mailto:asqueaker@gmail.com">asqueaker@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> I thought you were implicitly expressing conditional approval by this<br>
> suggestion..<br>
<br>
</div>Didn't mean to imply that. I just want to argue against the best possible case you could have made, not getting hung up on minor flaws. ;)<br>
<br>
Besides, we may end up using this after all, so far I am alone in speaking out against the idea.<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
- Bert -<br>
</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
<br>
><br>
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Bert Freudenberg <<a href="mailto:bert@freudenbergs.de">bert@freudenbergs.de</a>> wrote:<br>
>> On 2013-08-15, at 16:55, <a href="mailto:commits@source.squeak.org">commits@source.squeak.org</a> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>>> Chris Muller uploaded a new version of Monticello to project The Trunk:<br>
>>> <a href="http://source.squeak.org/trunk/Monticello-cmm.558.mcz" target="_blank">http://source.squeak.org/trunk/Monticello-cmm.558.mcz</a><br>
>>><br>
>>> ==================== Summary ====================<br>
>>><br>
>>> Name: Monticello-cmm.558<br>
>>> Author: cmm<br>
>>> Time: 15 August 2013, 11:55:22.698 am<br>
>>> UUID: 90d5e73c-dd83-4b82-82c0-7c1a48814f51<br>
>>> Ancestors: Monticello-cmm.557<br>
>>><br>
>>> - If an older version is not found in the repository it should be in, copy it where it should from the MCRepositoryGroup default. If it's not found there, signal an error that it needs to be copied there.<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> I don't think just browsing something should cause a commit to an arbitrary repository.<br>
>><br>
>> It's much more likely that a child of this info is in a repository (or even in the image) that has the full ancestry data. You don't need to load that specific version, any descendant will do. The most recent would be the best bet, I'd think.<br>
>><br>
>> - Bert -<br>
>><br>
>><br>
<br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>