<div dir="ltr"><div><div>What is the last time this code were used? 3.8 image?<br></div>The clean way is to isolate a package then remove it (if we think that code has an interest and could be revived).<br></div>Otherwise, the fast way is to just remove...<br>
</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2013/11/24 Frank Shearar <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:frank.shearar@gmail.com" target="_blank">frank.shearar@gmail.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Utilities' "fetching updates" category seems obsolete - that's all the<br>
bits to work with an update stream, isn't it?<br>
<br>
If we want to continue with infrastructure for an update stream, why<br>
don't we put all this stuff together in its own package? Especially,<br>
can we pull the state out of Utilities? UpdateDownloader and<br>
UpdateUrlLists belong together in a separate object.<br>
<br>
It's not just Utilities though - I've seen a whole bunch of methods<br>
all over the place (he says not bothering to go find all those places)<br>
that look like they deal with update streams. These could also go into<br>
this new package.<br>
<br>
It ought to be the work of a few hours, for someone keen to improve<br>
the state of affairs!<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
frank<br>
<br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br></div>