<div dir="ltr">Hi Florin,<br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Florin Mateoc <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:florin.mateoc@gmail.com" target="_blank">florin.mateoc@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi Frank,<br>
<div class="im"><br>
On 11/22/2013 11:09 AM, Frank Shearar wrote:<br>
> I'd rather waste an entire class and kill Utilities, than have<br>
> Utilities continually stick a spanner in the more important objective<br>
> of modularity.<br>
><br>
> First Utilities, then the world!<br>
><br>
> frank<br>
<br>
</div>I think overrides (a la VW, but they could be done even better) </blockquote><div><br></div><div>+1. I was the guilty party that f**ed up the implementation of the VW ones (but then it was my idea also). See <a href="http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2010-January/142760.html">http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2010-January/142760.html</a> for a better approach to implementation. Does it make sense to you?</div>
<div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">could solve these entanglement problems much easier<br>
(after the initial investment), directly attacking modularity and helping address other issues in this area:<br>
loading/unloading, minimal image, versioning.<br>
<span class=""><font color="#888888"><br>
Florin<br></font></span></blockquote></div><div><br></div>-- <br>best,<div>Eliot</div>
</div></div>