<html><head></head><body bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(26, 26, 26, 0.296875); -webkit-composition-fill-color: rgba(175, 192, 227, 0.230469); -webkit-composition-frame-color: rgba(77, 128, 180, 0.230469); ">On 02 Dec 2013, at 22:42, Chris Muller <<a href="mailto:ma.chris.m@gmail.com">ma.chris.m@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span></div><div><br></div><div></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div dir="ltr">It appears it was due to a corrupt ancestry in 45Deprecated. 45Deprecated-fbs.3 was the version included in Squeak4.5-13352 at the FTP site, but since no future package had that version as an ancestor, everything was merged during the update, resulting in spurious dirties.<div>
<br></div><div>I reposted Squeak4.5-13352 with 45Deprecated-fbs.5 loaded and that seems to fix it. </div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Thanks for taking the time to find & fix the problem (especially since it's my fault). However, we should never replace/alter versioned artifacts. I would rather you had deleted the file and put a new file with a different name on the site. Even calling it 4.4-rc0 would work for me, but definitely not 4.5-13352.</div><div><br></div><div>frank</div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Frank Shearar <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:frank.shearar@gmail.com" target="_blank">frank.shearar@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On 2 December 2013 20:18, Chris Muller <<a href="mailto:asqueaker@gmail.com">asqueaker@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> This method keeps appearing in my image, causing a dirty ST80 package.<br>
> Is anyone else seeing this? No senders, but I keep needing to revert<br>
> the package to know what I've got dirty in the image.<br>
<br>
I can't say I've seen this.<br>
<br>
> Also seeing some spurious class-category "changes" causing dirty<br>
> packages, even though I'm not doing any recategorizing..<br>
<br>
I make sure nowadays that I don't issue commits with shuffled class<br>
categories, but I certainly have done so in the past. Monticello<br>
considers an order change in the categories to be significant, but I<br>
vaguely remember Bert committing something to mitigate the issue.<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
frank<br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></blockquote></body></html>