<div dir="ltr">I have ToolBuilder-Tests after updating from trunk. I unloaded ToolBuilderTests.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Frank Shearar <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:frank.shearar@gmail.com" target="_blank">frank.shearar@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Despite the lack of a ToolBuilderTests, and the presence of a<br>
ToolBuilder-Tests package, Monticello Browser tells me that I have a<br>
ToolBuilderTests, not a ToolBuilder-Tests.<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
frank<br>
</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
On 11 December 2013 20:56, Frank Shearar <<a href="mailto:frank.shearar@gmail.com">frank.shearar@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> OK, I think I've done the right thing - mind giving it a check?<br>
><br>
> frank<br>
><br>
> On 11 December 2013 11:20, Frank Shearar <<a href="mailto:frank.shearar@gmail.com">frank.shearar@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>> Thanks, Chris. I've prepped the changes, and I'll push them tonight.<br>
>><br>
>> frank<br>
>><br>
>> On 11 December 2013 02:19, Chris Muller <<a href="mailto:ma.chris.m@gmail.com">ma.chris.m@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>>> - delete ToolBuilderTests-fbs.2 too, since you have its code in the new -1.<br>
>>><br>
>>> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 8:17 PM, Chris Muller <<a href="mailto:ma.chris.m@gmail.com">ma.chris.m@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>>>> Since there is no ancestry yet, you can remove the ancestry and start over:<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> - Delete working copy ToolBuilderTests.<br>
>>>> - Add ToolBuilderTests back (+Package button). Ancestry is now clean.<br>
>>>> - Use the rename function from the menu to rename ToolBuilderTests to<br>
>>>> ToolBuilder-Tests.<br>
>>>> - Save ToolBuilder-Tests-fbs.1.<br>
>>>> - delete ToolBuilderTests-fbs.1 from the repository.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Frank Shearar <<a href="mailto:frank.shearar@gmail.com">frank.shearar@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>>>>> n 10 December 2013 00:21, Chris Muller <<a href="mailto:asqueaker@gmail.com">asqueaker@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>>>>>>>> PS -- Since it was for aesthetic reasons, it would be better and more<br>
>>>>>>>> consistent if it were named "ToolBuilder-Tests" instead of<br>
>>>>>>>> "ToolBuilderTests".<br>
>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>> Sure, but then Monticello forces you to have as many packages as there are<br>
>>>>>>> ToolBuilder-Foo thingies, right? That's ok for ToolBuilder, but for Tools<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> I was talking about ToolBuilder-*, not Tools. The other packages in<br>
>>>>>> the family are<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> ToolBuilder-Morphic<br>
>>>>>> ToolBuilder-MVC<br>
>>>>>> ToolBuilder-SUnit<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> Whoa! ALL of which have no definitions! Frank is this something you<br>
>>>>>> modularized out? So we should somehow remove these WorkingCopy's from<br>
>>>>>> the trunk image. Via some postscript perhaps?<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> Nah, I just did the wrong thing. Worse, I even paused to think about<br>
>>>>> the package name before doing the wrong thing. The question is: how to<br>
>>>>> rename the package? It's trivial to rename the package through the UI.<br>
>>>>> But now I have a ToolBuilderTests-fbs.2. Is the right thing to do the<br>
>>>>> following?:<br>
>>>>> * rename the mcz to ToolBuilder-Tests-fbs.2<br>
>>>>> * copy that to trunk<br>
>>>>> * change the config map to reference this instead of ToolBuilderTests-fbs.1<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> frank<br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>