<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Chris Muller <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:asqueaker@gmail.com" target="_blank">asqueaker@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Yes. I've always liked how everything we do in Smalltalk is built on<br>
an aggregation of just 3 or 4 concepts, and that's it. THAT is pretty<br>
slick in itself.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Agreed.</div><div><br></div><div>I suppose the appropriate term for the Smalltalk community would be "domain-specific vocabulary." We don't create a a separate language, with its own syntax and grammar, but we do tend to create to create a coherent system of nouns and verbs (classes and messages) that draw directly from the problem domain. Let's all write slick DSVs!</div>
<div><br></div><div>Colin</div></div></div></div>