<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 9:15 PM, Eliot Miranda <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:eliot.miranda@gmail.com" target="_blank">eliot.miranda@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><div><div class="h5"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><div></div><div>So it looks like the shrink works. It doesn't do much, though. My image goes from 20.9MB, down to 20.3MB. </div></div></div></div></blockquote>
<div><br></div></div></div><div>and (just to check) you've already done Smalltalk unloadReloadablePackages? I managed to get down to a 12 Mb minimal trunk but I had to hack fix a lot of MNUs. Basically we have work to do to make those packages really unload.</div>
</div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Yup, #unloadReloadablePackages is part of #shrink. I was able to get down to about 19MB with no problems by unloading test packages. When I moved on to unloading production code that I don't need, I started getting MNUs too. I'll keep hacking at it until I see diminishing returns.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Thanks!</div><div><br></div><div>Colin</div></div></div></div>