<div dir="ltr">Hello Chris,<div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 2:19 AM, Chris Muller <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:asqueaker@gmail.com" target="_blank">asqueaker@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im"><br>
<br>
</div>A lot of thoughtful consideration, design, and implementation work<br>
went into it. It's a major productivity boost. It alleviates 90% of<br>
manual sizing otherwise required by the user in a typical day.<br><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_extra">As for me, manual sizing and having a lot of opened code browser windows in quit different visual, geometry forms, defined by own is one of the things that improves my development productivity. </div>
<div class="gmail_extra">So, that you could think "visually and tactile", when your interaction with windows remains invariant and saved. May be, auto-layout (cassowary ect.) could be activated while resizing the windows, preventing from destruction effect, but not after that. Thinking, that automatically reposition is more suitable to one-window-browser development environments, but Squeak from the beginning is famous for its high creative abilities in manual morph transformation (rotate browser to the angle of 90 and program in it .)</div>
<div class="gmail_extra">So, the idea is great! But, may be not for all Squeakers to be activated by default.</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Regards,</div><div class="gmail_extra">
Nikolay</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br></div></div>