<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=windows-1252"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"><br><div><div>On 10 Feb 2014, at 11:08, Stéphane Ducasse <<a href="mailto:stephane.ducasse@inria.fr">stephane.ducasse@inria.fr</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=windows-1252"><div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"><div><br><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div style="font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;">Phil,<br><br>This matter is actually very important for Smalltalk community, because<br>it exposes nontransparent, meddling behind the scenes, and in some cases<br>blatantly unethical behavior of some ESUG board members. Which is<br>certainly bad for our community on long term.<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Janko CAN YOU STOP!</div><div><br></div><div>"blatantly unethical behavior”</div><div>Really</div><div><br></div></div></div></blockquote><br></div><div>I propose we do at the next ESUG the following:</div><div><br></div><div>- the general assembly sets up and vote for a small group</div><div> (3-5 people?)</div><div>- they look into the issues</div><div>- then report back to the general assembly</div><div><br></div><div>It will of course been taken care that this gremium is independed.</div><div><br></div><div>Because via email this is really not going to work.</div><div><br></div><div><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>Marcus</div></body></html>