<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 11:50 AM, David T. Lewis <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:lewis@mail.msen.com" target="_blank">lewis@mail.msen.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="">On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 11:44:34AM -0700, Eliot Miranda wrote:<br>
> On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Nicolas Cellier <<br>
> <a href="mailto:nicolas.cellier.aka.nice@gmail.com">nicolas.cellier.aka.nice@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
</div><div class="">> > A 64 bits Spur should also scale our SmallIntegers up to 2^62, which can<br>
> > completely change the figures anyway.<br>
><br>
> Likely 2^60. 3 bits for tags, 1 bit for sign, hence SmallInteger maxVal =<br>
> (2^60) - 1 , which is 36,000 years into the future :-)<br>
><br>
> DateAndTime fromSeconds: (1 << 60) - 1 // 1000000 38435-08-17T21:30:06-07:00<br>
<br>
</div>Ha! Reminds me of the guy who thought 640k was going to be enough ;-)<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Upload your consciousness today ;-)</div><div><br></div><div>e</div><div></div></div>
</div></div>