<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"><html><head><meta content="text/html;charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type"></head><body ><div style='font-size:10pt;font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;'><div>Hope I am not starting a religious war, but...</div><div><br></div><div>I have found the idiom of "I " much easier to parse and edit rather than "A Dude is xxxxxxxxx" when entering class comments. </div><div><br></div><div>With the former, I just position the mouse and start typing: 'I ' -> 'I act as a formal frabulator for the system frisbnitsk decompulation subprocess'.</div><div>With the latter, I must delete the 'is xxxxxxxxx' before I start commenting: 'A Dude is xxxxxxxxx ' -> 'A Dude acts as a formal frabulator for the system frisbnitsk decompulation subprocess'</div><div><br></div><div>The mental flow for the former is "think", "type".</div><div>The mental flow for the latter is "grrrrrr", "edit" , "think" , "type"</div><div><br></div><div>The former offers the opportunity for different verbs right off the bat: "I am ", "I act" , "I perform " , "I flail"</div><div>The latter requires we ponder the suitability of the verb "is", accept or reject its suitability (This is the time sink for me) , think of a new verb if rejected, delete the verb and type the verb.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Scanning the Kernel-Class package, there is a lot of history surrounding Class comments so I can take the answer 'no' gracefully. 'yes' would be good, however. (:</div><div><br></div><div>cheers.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>tty</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><br></div></body></html>