<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 7:58 PM, Craig Latta <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:craig@netjam.org" target="_blank">craig@netjam.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
> In this case, I think that caused a problem for a different reason.<br>
> Out of convenience (and this is something I will not do again), I<br>
> sometimes start a new mail message by "replying" to an old one, then<br>
> changing to my new subject line. I had assumed (without ever<br>
> bothering to check) that mail threading is done based on subject<br>
> line, and had not noticed that the mail headers contain the<br>
> "In-Reply-To:" information that no doubt is used for connecting the<br>
> mail threads.<br>
<br>
Yes; in my case the <a href="http://gmane.org" target="_blank">gmane.org</a> mail/NNTP gateway uses that to make<br>
its references headers, and Mozilla Thunderbird uses those headers to<br>
display and manipulate threads when I read the<br>
gmane.comp.lang.smalltalk.squeak.general newsgroup.<br>
<br>
> So in the future I will not use "reply to" unless actually replying<br>
> to something.<br>
<br>
Thanks again!<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Once again the tail wags the dog. So to do something natural like reply and change subject is outlawed because fixable software is broken? If we continue to tolerate the broken, guess what?</div>
<div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
<br>
-C<br>
<br>
--<br>
Craig Latta<br>
<a href="http://www.netjam.org" target="_blank">www.netjam.org</a><br>
<a href="tel:%2B31%20%20%206%202757%207177" value="+31627577177">+31 6 2757 7177</a> (SMS ok)<br>
+ 1 415 287 3547 (no SMS)<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br>best,<div>Eliot</div>
</div></div>