<div dir="ltr">Ok. I certainly will do so.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Chris Muller <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:asqueaker@gmail.com" target="_blank">asqueaker@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Let us know when you feel its ready for full-on testing. I'll pull<br>
them in and run some regression tests.<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 1:29 AM, Chris Cunningham<br>
<<a href="mailto:cunningham.cb@gmail.com">cunningham.cb@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Now in the InBox:<br>
> KernelTests-cbc.278.mcz<br>
> Kernel-cbc.871.mcz<br>
> The tests add in test for expected Duration addition and subtraction from<br>
> each other, including the new GenericMonth and GenericYear, and the very new<br>
> GenericDuration. It also adds a few more tests for LeapYear tests with<br>
> adding years to them.<br>
><br>
> The test are still based on what it currently does, with the exceptions<br>
> listed previously (I haven't really changed any to expect failures, as has<br>
> been suggested - that will come shortly. For now, I want to try to cause<br>
> little to no changes o expected behavior first - just new behavior for now).<br>
><br>
> Kernel adds the GenericDuration, and handles adding and subtracting<br>
> GenericMonth, GenericYear, and GenericDurations togeher in a rational way.<br>
> This involves turning + and - in Durations into a double-dispatch so that it<br>
> will work.<br>
><br>
> There are no comments yet in these classes - they will be there before the<br>
> weekend is over at the latest.<br>
><br>
> Any comments are more than welcome.<br>
><br>
> -cbc<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>