<div dir="ltr">Thanks guys!</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 5:52 PM, David T. Lewis <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:lewis@mail.msen.com" target="_blank">lewis@mail.msen.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">> On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 08:37:56PM -0400, Chris Cunnington wrote:<br>
> > On Oct 14, 2014, at 8:14 PM, Dale Henrichs <<a href="mailto:dale.henrichs@gemtalksystems.com">dale.henrichs@gemtalksystems.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> ><br>
> > Getting a 503 at the moment ...<br>
><br>
</span><span class="">> Yes. I noticed this morning that Chris Muller has started a new SS process<br>
> on box4. And the usual address [1] is routing to the default when there is<br>
> no service on box2. I conclude that he is moving SS to box4 and is in-between<br>
> boxes. I would imagine that the process on box4 needs to be announced by<br>
> routing the dns on box2 to its new location [2].<br>
><br>
<br>
</span>No this is nothing to do with anything on box4. The <a href="http://build.squeak.org" target="_blank">build.squeak.org</a> service<br>
is on box3 along with <a href="http://squeaksource.com" target="_blank">squeaksource.com</a>. Squeaksource is fine, but Jenkins is<br>
not. There are currently about 30 Squeak VMs of various flavors running under<br>
the Jenkins uid. Ick. I'll try to restart the Jenkins service and see if I can<br>
clear out the mess.<br>
<br>
Dave<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>