<div dir="ltr"><span style="font-size:12.6666669845581px">Hi,</span><div style="font-size:12.6666669845581px">There is no difference to appearance with or without you change set.</div><div style="font-size:12.6666669845581px"><br></div><div style="font-size:12.6666669845581px">There is also some difference between little and big endian'nes on Windows 8.1. Trunk latest.</div><div style="font-size:12.6666669845581px"><br></div><div style><span style="font-size:12.6666669845581px"><a href="http://imgur.com/LzBXR0R">http://imgur.com/LzBXR0R</a></span><br></div><div style><span style="font-size:12.6666669845581px"><br></span></div><div style><span style="font-size:12.6666669845581px">Karl</span></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 2:19 PM, J. Vuletich (mail lists) <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:juanlists@jvuletich.org" target="_blank">juanlists@jvuletich.org</a>></span> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><u></u>
<div style="font-family:Arial;font-size:14px">
<p>So, does my fix work for you?<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Juan Vuletich<br>
<br>
Quoting karl ramberg <<a href="mailto:karlramberg@gmail.com" target="_blank">karlramberg@gmail.com</a>>:</p><div><div class="h5">
<blockquote style="border-left:2px solid blue;margin-left:2px;padding-left:12px" type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">There seem to be is some issues in Trunk on conversion between 32 bit and 16 bit display depth. Changing display depth shows the issue.
<div>
<div>When I open the monkey1.png it has transparent pixels in 32 bit but opaque white in 16.</div>
</div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div>Karl</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 8:09 PM, tim Rowledge <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:tim@rowledge.org" target="_blank">tim@rowledge.org</a>></span> wrote:
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<p><br>
<span>On 12-12-2014, at 3:04 AM, Bert Freudenberg <<a href="mailto:bert@freudenbergs.de" target="_blank">bert@freudenbergs.de</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> On 12.12.2014, at 04:47, tim Rowledge <<a href="mailto:tim@rowledge.org" target="_blank">tim@rowledge.org</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> monkey1.png where the background should be transparent but appears as white -<a href="https://copy.com/lgAtv9rDlTGaGb9m" target="_blank">https://copy.com/lgAtv9rDlTGaGb9m</a><br>
>> bananas1.png (similar but different in detail) - <a href="https://copy.com/Vsj8lgqtyQmwIerA" target="_blank">https://copy.com/Vsj8lgqtyQmwIerA</a><br>
><br>
> Both work fine if I simply drop them into a 4.5 image. I can move/rotate/scale no problem. Shadow rendering is not nice, but that's a problem of the shadow renderer, not the bitmap itself.</span><br>
<br>
Sigh. It looks ok when used that way because the process makes a SketchMorph which draws by use of blending. Which is pretty much exactly what I said, though possibly rather long-windedly. Scratch has to use paint. Well, it could of course be changed to use blend but as previously explained that has a risk of messing up old projects and costing too much time on slower machines.<br>
<br>
OK, I give up.<br>
<br>
<span>tim<br>
--<br>
tim Rowledge; <a href="mailto:tim@rowledge.org" target="_blank">tim@rowledge.org</a>; <a href="http://www.rowledge.org/tim" target="_blank">http://www.rowledge.org/tim</a></span><br>
How do I set my laser printer on stun?<br>
<br>
<br>
</p>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
<br></p>
</div></div></div>
</blockquote></div></div>