<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 2:10 AM, Tobias Pape <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:Das.Linux@gmx.de" target="_blank">Das.Linux@gmx.de</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hey,<br>
<span class=""><br>
On 20.01.2015, at 07:27, <a href="mailto:commits@source.squeak.org">commits@source.squeak.org</a> wrote:<br>
<br>
> Marcel Taeumel uploaded a new version of Collections to project The Trunk:<br>
> <a href="http://source.squeak.org/trunk/Collections-mt.602.mcz" target="_blank">http://source.squeak.org/trunk/Collections-mt.602.mcz</a><br>
><br>
> ==================== Summary ====================<br>
><br>
> Name: Collections-mt.602<br>
> Author: mt<br>
> Time: 20 January 2015, 8:27:19.919 am<br>
> UUID: 96d6fefa-c902-7640-bd09-c17016199e81<br>
> Ancestors: Collections-ul.601<br>
><br>
> Merged improvements for OrderedDictionary from inbox (ul.601).<br>
><br>
> Fixed problem in (mt.600 version) #copyFrom:to: with memory allocation. Preferred this over ul.601 because it is faster (8 per second vs. 12 per second).<br>
><br>
> d := OrderedDictionary new.<br>
> 1 to: 1000000 do: [:ea | d at: ea put: nil].<br>
> [d copyFrom: 250000 to: 750000] bench.<br>
><br>
> =============== Diff against Collections-mt.600 ===============<br>
><br>
<br>
</span>Process question.<br>
Marcel just merged the changes from an inbox commit.<br>
Should Collections-ul.601 be<br>
a) moved to Trunk (for ancestry) or<br>
b) moved to the treated inbox or<br>
c) be delete or<br>
d) be left alone?<br><br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>The MC model is a useful historical model only when backed by a repository with all ancestral versions.</div><div><br></div><div>So, the answer is (a).</div><div><br></div></div></div></div>