<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Chris Muller <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ma.chris.m@gmail.com" target="_blank">ma.chris.m@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">We really should finally compressChanges and condenseSources for this<br>
release. The last time we spoke about this, I believe we said we want<br>
to:<br>
<br>
1) current changes merged into .sources.<br>
2) exclude leaves in history (methods with no descendants)<br>
3) except the current one of course<br>
4) all prior history with descendants is kept<br>
<br>
Did I say that right? We need a volunteer to look into this.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>That's right. I think another way of saying it is</div><div> </div><div><span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-size:13px"> 1) current changes merged into .sources.</span><br style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-size:13px"><span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-size:13px"> 2) save unbranched history of each method</span></div></div><br clear="all"><div>The additional work is to derive, and merge the history of methods from prior releases. Maybe that's what you mean by 4 above. </div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature">best,<div>Eliot</div></div>
</div></div>