<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 8:34 AM, Marcel Taeumel <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:marcel.taeumel@student.hpi.uni-potsdam.de" target="_blank">marcel.taeumel@student.hpi.uni-potsdam.de</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi Eliot,<br>
<br>
right now, I am working only on the HelpBrowser (~1-2 weeks left), doing<br>
some code clean-up and also some bug fixing -- including ui bugs. ;-)<br>
<br>
No bigger change (major changes to standard tools or new tools) planned from<br>
my side. As for the stability, my observation is that we are getting more<br>
stable with every update.<br>
<br>
But what about new packages for this release:<br>
- SqueakSSL<br>
- WebClient<br>
<br>
Any ideas on that?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>It's not my call. My concern here is VM impact. Only SqueakSSL has implications for the VM right? I would have to make sure that SqueakSSL builds correctly and the tests pass for all platforms. With help from those that have compiled and used SqueakSSL I think I could manage that.</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
Best,<br>
Marcel<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
--<br>
View this message in context: <a href="http://forum.world.st/A-plan-for-the-release-tp4817346p4817347.html" target="_blank">http://forum.world.st/A-plan-for-the-release-tp4817346p4817347.html</a><br>
Sent from the Squeak - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature">best,<div>Eliot</div></div>
</div></div>