<div dir="ltr">ProportionalSplitterMorph looks for property minWidth and minHeight in the pluggable panels when setting limits for it's movement. <div>This could probably be set to a default in each pluggable panel.</div><div><br></div><div>We could add this check for minWidth and minHeight for the AbstractResizerMorph hierarchy as well. </div><div><br></div><div>Karl </div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Marcel Taeumel <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:marcel.taeumel@student.hpi.uni-potsdam.de" target="_blank">marcel.taeumel@student.hpi.uni-potsdam.de</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">The problem is simple: How to compute your minimal extent if all your<br>
children have LayoutFrames and are arbitrarily placed on screen? What *is*<br>
minimal width, for example? See, a parent morph as to correctly combine all<br>
its children's #minExtent. This is easy for TableLayout, because there are<br>
only rows and columns. ProportionalLayout is more difficult. Such an<br>
algorithm has to be quite fast. :)<br>
<br>
Best,<br>
Marcel<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
--<br>
View this message in context: <a href="http://forum.world.st/The-Trunk-ToolBuilder-Morphic-mt-131-mcz-tp4819699p4820245.html" target="_blank">http://forum.world.st/The-Trunk-ToolBuilder-Morphic-mt-131-mcz-tp4819699p4820245.html</a><br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">Sent from the Squeak - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.<br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>