<div dir="ltr">Ah, I was using a Spur image.<div><br></div><div>Karl</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Levente Uzonyi <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:leves@elte.hu" target="_blank">leves@elte.hu</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">There's update-topa.307, which contains these packages.<br>
<br>
Levente<br>
<br>
On Tue, 21 Apr 2015, karl ramberg wrote:<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Great.Seems we need to issue a update map before these gets pulled in by updating.<div><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
Can also remove Universes package ? <br>
That also needs to be done in a update map, I think<br>
<br>
Karl<br>
<br>
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 10:54 PM, Tobias Pape <<a href="mailto:Das.Linux@gmx.de" target="_blank">Das.Linux@gmx.de</a>> wrote:<br>
Hi,<br>
<br>
On 14.04.2015, at 14:18, karl ramberg <<a href="mailto:karlramberg@gmail.com" target="_blank">karlramberg@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> We should pull these in to trunk as soon as possible so we can get stuff tested before the release of a new image.<br>
><br>
> Can you do that Levente, as you seem most familiar with the changes you made ?<br>
><br>
<br>
Although I am not levente I went ahead and pushed SqueakSSL and WebClient into<br>
the trunk. Lets see how it turns out.<br>
<br>
Best<br>
-Tobias<br>
<br>
> Karl<br>
><br>
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 9:22 PM, Tobias Pape <<a href="mailto:Das.Linux@gmx.de" target="_blank">Das.Linux@gmx.de</a>> wrote:<br>
> Hi Levente<br>
><br>
> On <a href="tel:06.04.2015" value="+466042015" target="_blank">06.04.2015</a>, at 20:43, Levente Uzonyi <<a href="mailto:leves@elte.hu" target="_blank">leves@elte.hu</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> > It would be better for these packages too, because they would get more<br>
> > attention.<br>
> > The SqueakSSL/WebClient changes I made in October[1] are still missing from the official repositories.<br>
> ><br>
> > Levente<br>
> ><br>
> > [1] <a href="http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2014-October/180251.html" target="_blank">http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2014-October/180251.html</a><br>
> ><br>
><br>
> I just now saw that there is more than just vm stuff.<br>
><br>
> The problem with WebClient and SqueakSSL as of now is, that<br>
> its maintenance-ship is, well, complicated. I went forth and<br>
> pushed tiny changes to WebClient by just being somewhat on<br>
> my own initiative[1].<br>
><br>
> ===========<br>
><br>
> Dear Squeak Community as a whole and dear Ron as person possibly<br>
> best fit to make a decision on this:<br>
><br>
> Should we put the maintainer-ship of WebClient and<br>
> SqueakSSL into the hands of the Squeak Core Team?<br>
><br>
><br>
> ===========<br>
><br>
> Best<br>
> -Tobias<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> [1]: There's a saying, initiative is discipline-lessness with positive outcome<br>
><br>
> > On Mon, 6 Apr 2015, Tobias Pape wrote:<br>
> ><br>
> >><br>
> >> On <a href="tel:06.04.2015" value="+466042015" target="_blank">06.04.2015</a>, at 18:59, David T. Lewis <<a href="mailto:lewis@mail.msen.com" target="_blank">lewis@mail.msen.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> >><br>
> >>>> On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Marcel Taeumel<br>
> >>>> <<a href="mailto:marcel.taeumel@student.hpi.uni-potsdam.de" target="_blank">marcel.taeumel@student.hpi.uni-potsdam.de</a>> wrote:<br>
> >>>>> Hey! :)<br>
> >>>>><br>
> >>>>> Can we add both to the update map (somehow?) and see if it works out<br>
> >>>>> during<br>
> >>>>> the following days/weeks until the release?<br>
> >>>><br>
> >>>> +1<br>
> >>>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>> What is the point of moving these into the base image? Aren't these<br>
> >>> exactly the kinds of things that you would want to have maintained as<br>
> >>> independent packages that can be easily loaded from SqueakMap?<br>
> >><br>
> >> I think both these are Extremely Important (capital).<br>
> >> WebClient as replacement for HTTPSocket (it already provides a compatibility<br>
> >> layer; Andreas seemed to always considered WebClient to replace HTTPSocket),<br>
> >> and SqueakSSL because you can't load anything meaningful on the web without<br>
> >> SSL; github, twitter, most sites. And that's good.<br>
> >> Plus we _finally_ could put the Plain Text Passwords for Monticello behind<br>
> >> SSL…<br>
> >><br>
> >> Best<br>
> >> -Tobias<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote>
<br><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>