<div dir="ltr">I'm using OS X Yosemite.<div>Hope this helps.</div><div><br></div><div>Regards,<br><div>Fabio</div><div><br><div class="GmSign">--<br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 6:48 PM Tobias Pape <<a href="mailto:Das.Linux@gmx.de">Das.Linux@gmx.de</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
On 19.07.2015, at 18:34, Chris Muller <<a href="mailto:asqueaker@gmail.com" target="_blank">asqueaker@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> Thanks Fabio, say, which platform did you test on? Hm, something<br>
> interesting -- that new SqueakSSL (for Linux) is 7 MB where the one I<br>
> have been using is only 27K, which easily makes it the largest plugin<br>
> and would slightly inflate teh size of the All-In-One.<br>
><br>
> Why is it so much bigger, is it compiled with debug information or something?<br>
<br>
No, I statically linked against LibreSSL.<br>
<br>
Best regards<br>
-Tobias<br>
<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 3:56 AM, Fabio Niephaus <<a href="mailto:lists@fniephaus.com" target="_blank">lists@fniephaus.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>> + 1 for releasing 4.6 and handling problems as users find them :)<br>
>><br>
>> But there's one problem that I just found: try and run the following and you<br>
>> should get a SqueakSSL error (-5):<br>
>><br>
>> (WebClient new httpGet:<br>
>> '<a href="https://api.travis-ci.org/repos/squeak-smalltalk/squeak.org/builds" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://api.travis-ci.org/repos/squeak-smalltalk/squeak.org/builds</a>')<br>
>> content<br>
>><br>
>> Looks like we forgot to update the SqueakSSL plugins with the ones from [1]?<br>
>> After doing that manually, the above works just fine...<br>
>><br>
>> Regards,<br>
>> Fabio<br>
>><br>
>> [1] <a href="https://github.com/itsmeront/squeakssl/releases" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://github.com/itsmeront/squeakssl/releases</a><br>
>><br>
>> --<br>
>><br>
>> On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 11:06 PM Eliot Miranda <<a href="mailto:eliot.miranda@gmail.com" target="_blank">eliot.miranda@gmail.com</a>><br>
>> wrote:<br>
>>><br>
>>> On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Chris Muller <<a href="mailto:ma.chris.m@gmail.com" target="_blank">ma.chris.m@gmail.com</a>><br>
>>> wrote:<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> There was 1 vote for including the legacy Mac plugins and 0 against.<br>
>>>> So Craig and I made one last All-in-One and its uploaded.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> So, I think can we call 4.6 "done" then?<br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>> Do we have any volunteers to do some shake down tests? dare we do some<br>
>>> shake down tests? SHould we instead release and handle problems as users<br>
>>> find them? Chris, have you run your test suite using the 4.6 yet?<br>
>>><br>
>>> --<br>
>>> _,,,^..^,,,_<br>
>>> best, Eliot<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div></div></div></div>