<div style="white-space:pre-wrap">You're right! Just signed up: fniephaus<br><br>Best,<br>Fabio</div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Tue 15 Sep 2015 at 06:23 Frank Shearar <<a href="mailto:frank.shearar@gmail.com">frank.shearar@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Do you have an account on <a href="http://bugs.squeak.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">bugs.squeak.org</a>? I don't think so, but if<br>
you set one up, I'll be happy to set up the permissions for you.<br>
<br>
frank<br>
<br>
On 14 September 2015 at 11:17, Fabio Niephaus <<a href="mailto:lists@fniephaus.com" target="_blank">lists@fniephaus.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Since I created and maintain the new Squeak website, feel free to list me as<br>
> the owner.<br>
><br>
> Best,<br>
> Fabio<br>
><br>
> On Mon 14 Sep 2015 at 12:10 Frank Shearar <<a href="mailto:frank.shearar@gmail.com" target="_blank">frank.shearar@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> On 11 September 2015 at 20:05, David T. Lewis <<a href="mailto:lewis@mail.msen.com" target="_blank">lewis@mail.msen.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>> > Hi Eliot,<br>
>> ><br>
>> > I'm not sure how it's configured, but do we have a VM category, and the<br>
>> > issues are getting automatically assigned to me. The Mantis tracker is<br>
>> > quite helpful for VM issues that cannot be immediately resolved on the<br>
>> > mailing lists.<br>
>><br>
>> My apologies for leaving you off the list, Dave. Indeed, we already<br>
>> have a VM category, and you are its default owner.<br>
>><br>
>> frank<br>
>><br>
>> > Dave<br>
>> ><br>
>> >> Hi Frank,<br>
>> >><br>
>> >> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 2:13 AM, Frank Shearar<br>
>> >> <<a href="mailto:frank.shearar@gmail.com" target="_blank">frank.shearar@gmail.com</a>><br>
>> >> wrote:<br>
>> >><br>
>> >>> Mantis lets us configure default owners of tickets for various<br>
>> >>> subprojects. It's a bit.... out of date. (A "default owner" of a<br>
>> >>> subproject means that if you don't explicitly assign a ticket to<br>
>> >>> someone, this is the person to whom you implicitly assign the ticket.)<br>
>> >>><br>
>> >>> Any, Box-Admins both point to KenCausey, who must be tired of<br>
>> >>> receiving the occasional mail on these topics.<br>
>> >>><br>
>> >>> Here are our current mappings:<br>
>> >>> Any: KenCausey<br>
>> >>> Box-Admins: KenCausey<br>
>> >>> CI: FrankShearar<br>
>> >>> Documentation: casey<br>
>> >>> Games: asm<br>
>> >>> IRC: frankcag<br>
>> >>> Monticello: avi<br>
>> >>> News: gcorriga<br>
>> >>> Release Packaging: FrankShearar<br>
>> >>> SqueakMap: gokr<br>
>> >>> ToDo: RalphJohnson<br>
>> >>> Traits: dvf<br>
>> >>> <a href="http://www.squeak.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">www.squeak.org</a>: KarlRamberg<br>
>> >>><br>
>> >><br>
>> >> I hope we could add VM and I could be an owner or Dave could be.<br>
>> >><br>
>> >><br>
>> >>><br>
>> >>> I'm guessing they're so out of date because we tend not to use<br>
>> >>> <a href="http://bugs.squeak.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">bugs.squeak.org</a> very much (sadly).<br>
>> >>><br>
>> >>> I'm happy to stay default owner on my subprojects, unless someone else<br>
>> >>> would like to take the can. But certainly there are some projects that<br>
>> >>> really ought to change owner.<br>
>> >>><br>
>> >>> Being the default owner doesn't imply that you have to fix the bugs!<br>
>> >>> It just means there's a clear point of contact: someone will<br>
>> >>> definitely see the bug report because it lands in their mailbox.<br>
>> >>><br>
>> >>> The traffic from being an owner is... minimal. As in "because almost<br>
>> >>> no one uses the bugtracker you'll likely never see a mail" :)<br>
>> >>><br>
>> >>> frank<br>
>> >>><br>
>> >>><br>
>> >><br>
>> >><br>
>> >> --<br>
>> >> _,,,^..^,,,_<br>
>> >> best, Eliot<br>
>> >><br>
>> >><br>
>> ><br>
>> ><br>
>> ><br>
>><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
<br>
</blockquote></div>