<div dir="ltr"><div><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 7:20 PM, tim Rowledge <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:tim@rowledge.org" target="_blank">tim@rowledge.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class=""><div class="h5"><br>
> On 10-10-2015, at 2:10 AM, karl ramberg <<a href="mailto:karlramberg@gmail.com">karlramberg@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> Hackaday post:<br>
> <a href="http://hackaday.com/2015/10/08/latest-raspberry-pi-images-have-improved-scratch/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://hackaday.com/2015/10/08/latest-raspberry-pi-images-have-improved-scratch/</a><br>
><br>
> Hacker News post:<br>
> <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10363088" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10363088</a><br>
><br>
<br>
</div></div>On the one hand publicity is good, on the other... just read the comments. Sigh. So many idiots.<br></blockquote><div>I'll cut them some slack :-)</div>There is only so much attention span around. Once it runs out, the result is quite random. <div>And the rabbit hole runs very deep on projects like Scratch, with several implementations etc.</div><div><br></div><div>Karl</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
tim<br>
--<br>
tim Rowledge; <a href="mailto:tim@rowledge.org">tim@rowledge.org</a>; <a href="http://www.rowledge.org/tim" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.rowledge.org/tim</a><br>
Strange OpCodes: CPE: Create Parity Error<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div>