<div dir="ltr">Hi Marcel,<br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 1:15 AM, marcel.taeumel <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:Marcel.Taeumel@hpi.de" target="_blank">Marcel.Taeumel@hpi.de</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">What about saving timezone information, too? Taking on Eliot's thought about<br>
code from different packages, what about someone that makes a change at PST<br>
and one at UTC? ... How to merge those at the moment?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>This seems much more useful. I would like to see minute granularity UTC timestamps. And that reminds me I need to replace the time stuff in 5.0 with the microsecond clock support.</div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
Accurate timestamps are kind of important... :-/<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Yes, agreed. But method timestamps to second granularity? Why do you need that kind of granularity?</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
Best,<br>
Marcel<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
--<br>
View this message in context: <a href="http://forum.world.st/The-Trunk-System-mt-771-mcz-tp4856201p4856686.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://forum.world.st/The-Trunk-System-mt-771-mcz-tp4856201p4856686.html</a><br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">Sent from the Squeak - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.<br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><span style="font-size:small;border-collapse:separate"><div>_,,,^..^,,,_<br></div><div>best, Eliot</div></span></div></div></div>
</div></div>