<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 7:40 PM, tim Rowledge <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:tim@rowledge.org" target="_blank">tim@rowledge.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Should we keep Traits? It was a neat idea that I was happy to support but it got left unfinished. Where are tools to develop & manage Traits? Where is the usage?<br>
<br>
Unless there is a compelling reason - and subsequent effort to fill out support - I suggest we should remove them. Along with Islands. And Universes. And probably Environments too, since that has stalled without becoming a proper part of the system.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Yes, it's very hard to maintain half implemented stuff, that lacks documentation and direction. </div><div>And if people really cared about any of these I guess they would be used somehow. And improved over the years. Very little has happened with either of these.</div><div><br></div><div>If these subsystems are just cruft left over and nobody uses them, it would be good to move them out of trunk.</div><div><br></div><div>Best,</div><div>Karl</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
tim<br>
--<br>
tim Rowledge; <a href="mailto:tim@rowledge.org">tim@rowledge.org</a>; <a href="http://www.rowledge.org/tim" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.rowledge.org/tim</a><br>
Strange OpCodes: IG: Insert Garbage<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div>