<div dir="ltr">I moved them to MorphicExtras-Widgets<div><br></div><div>Best,</div><div>Karl</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 8:26 PM, Tobias Pape <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:Das.Linux@gmx.de" target="_blank">Das.Linux@gmx.de</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class=""><br>
On 21.11.2015, at 18:51, karl ramberg <<a href="mailto:karlramberg@gmail.com">karlramberg@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> ProgressMorph can by definition not be the standard widget since it is not used at all in the image.<br>
><br>
<br>
</span>But we're talking about Applications that are not in the base image, aren't we?<br>
It's like saying, "nobody in the Qt framework uses this widget, remove it", when<br>
actually, the users cannot be expected _within_ the framework but rather as users of<br>
the framework. Just because our bundled morphic tools/applications have no need<br>
for such a progress bar, does not mean that non-base-image applications have neither.<br>
<br>
Marcel made the case for a simple "questionnaire application" where you would want<br>
to indicate progress throughout the questioning process. The system progress bar<br>
would be unfit, as it is designed to be used modally (see examples of both progress morphs).<br>
<br>
Don't get me wrong, I'm not making the case for keeping things (the ProgressMorph in this case)<br>
just because, but to make sure we are not deprecating/obsoleting stuff that would<br>
count as framework outlet point or "public widgets".<br>
<br>
<br>
:)<br>
<br>
Best regards<br>
-Tobias<br>
<br>
PS: some other widgets that are unused in the base image<br>
JoysickMorph is only in Flaps<br>
MorphHierarchy (?)<br>
SelectedObjectThumbnail<br>
BackgroundMorph<br>
BasicButton<br>
(And others in the MorphicExtras-Widgets category)<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">><br>
> Best,<br>
> Karl<br>
><br>
><br>
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:52 PM, Tobias Pape <<a href="mailto:Das.Linux@gmx.de">Das.Linux@gmx.de</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> On 20.11.2015, at 23:37, karl ramberg <<a href="mailto:karlramberg@gmail.com">karlramberg@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> > Maybe it should be moved to MorphicExtras-Widgets ?<br>
> ><br>
> > If it's in Morphic-Widgets it's seems like it's the standard progress widget, which it is not .<br>
><br>
> It depends on what 'standard progress widget' means.<br>
><br>
> If it is the one I can just use in my mophic application, without anythin fancy, won't that be the 'standard widget'?<br>
> And the one opened during system progress (using that Progress Notification thingy) be the system progress widget, hence, 'non-standard' (but special) widget?<br>
><br>
> just my 2ct<br>
><br>
> Best regards<br>
> -Tobias<br>
><br>
><br>
> ><br>
> > Best,<br>
> > Karl<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 9:49 PM, marcel.taeumel <<a href="mailto:Marcel.Taeumel@hpi.de">Marcel.Taeumel@hpi.de</a>> wrote:<br>
> > Imagine a wizard that wants to indicate progress to the user. Or a<br>
> > questionnaire. :)<br>
> ><br>
> > Like this widget: <a href="http://doc.qt.io/qt-4.8/qprogressbar.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://doc.qt.io/qt-4.8/qprogressbar.html</a><br>
> ><br>
> > Maybe we need a PluggableProgressBar. I understand that the ProgressBarMorph<br>
> > used to be used to show system progress. Nevertheless, such a widget can be<br>
> > valuable for any application.<br>
> ><br>
> > Best,<br>
> > Marcel<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > --<br>
> > View this message in context: <a href="http://forum.world.st/The-Trunk-Morphic-kfr-1048-mcz-tp4862058p4862317.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://forum.world.st/The-Trunk-Morphic-kfr-1048-mcz-tp4862058p4862317.html</a><br>
> > Sent from the Squeak - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
<br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>